data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5d83/a5d83e73f93e3cfc092015ae28bdb1cb31173d81" alt=""
03 Jan Why Double Spends on BCH Are Not the Same as Replace-By-Fee Fraud
[ad_1]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce135/ce135345483a2d5a39dcf0bf822d28697d76297e" alt="Why Double Spends on BCH Are Not the Same as Replace-By-Fee Fraud"
When it comes to creating a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, accepting zero confirmation transactions becomes critically important. When a model’s main aim is to “just hodl” or push an isolated store of value narrative, important concerns like double spending can take a back seat, potentially opening a network to serious attack. A recent video demonstrating this risk saw some claiming such weaknesses are equally exploitable on the BCH chain. However, as the Replace-By-Fee (RBF) protocol isn’t part of the BCH codebase, the claims can be easily refuted and as such, the BCH community has been speaking out.
Also Read: Travelbybit to Drop Bitcoin Payments After Viral Double Spend Video
Double Spending BTC in the Wild
A double spend is just what it sounds like — spending the same bitcoin twice. Of course, this is a favorable proposition to bad actors, scammers and thieves, who are more than happy to make off with goods without paying a service…
[ad_2]
Source link