RATE Group | If Bitcoin Was a Security, It Would ‘Raise Substantial Issues’
64381
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-64381,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,side_area_uncovered_from_content,footer_responsive_adv,qode-content-sidebar-responsive,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-13.3,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-7.9,vc_responsive
 

If Bitcoin Was a Security, It Would ‘Raise Substantial Issues’

If Bitcoin Was a Security, It Would ‘Raise Substantial Issues’

[ad_1]

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet again officially stated that Bitcoin (BTC) is not a security.

In a letter to Cipher Technologies Bitcoin Fund dated Oct. 1 the SEC declined the investment company’s registration statement on the grounds (among others) that Bitcoin is not a security. 

Per the letter, Cipher attempted to register an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, implying that Bitcoin is a security.

Not a security

The SEC staff, on the other hand, has argued Cipher’s reasoning under the Howey test and its framework for analyzing digital assets published in April. The letter states:

“Among other things, we do not believe that current purchasers of Bitcoin are relying on the essential managerial and entrepreneurial efforts of others to produce a profit. Accordingly, because Cipher intends to invest substantially all of its assets in Bitcoin as currently structured, it does not meet the definition of an…

[ad_2]

Source link