RATE Group | Cashfusion Far More Practical Than Other Coinjoin Protocols, Says Data Analyst
77707
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-77707,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,side_area_uncovered_from_content,footer_responsive_adv,qode-content-sidebar-responsive,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-13.3,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-7.9,vc_responsive
 

Cashfusion Far More Practical Than Other Coinjoin Protocols, Says Data Analyst

Cashfusion Far More Practical Than Other Coinjoin Protocols, Says Data Analyst

[ad_1]

Cashfusion Far More Practical Than Other Coinjoin Protocols, Says Data Analyst

On January 29, data analyst James Waugh decided to test and see if the Cashfusion protocol was really anonymous. After testing Cashfusion, Waugh explained he sifted through a number of transaction inputs and outputs and realized that it’s “not possible to establish a concrete link” between them.

Also read: How to Obscure Bitcoin Cash Transaction Data by Leveraging Cashfusion

Cashfusion Tests Prove the Protocol’s Anonymity Set Is Greater Than Traditional Coinjoin Transactions

This week Bitcoin Cash supporters were pleased to see that Cashfusion passed rigorous testing when data analyst James Waugh decided to comb through a slew of Cashfusion transaction inputs and outputs. Following the experimentation, Waugh wrote a blog post on Medium called “Is Cashfusion Really Anonymous?” “A newer Coinjoin protocol called Cashfusion doesn’t enforce the requirement of equal payment amounts and instead purports anonymity due to the high number of…

[ad_2]

Source link